Acquiring, financing, or investing in California cannabis real estate requires due diligence that goes well beyond standard commercial property review. Every cannabis real estate transaction must address DCC license status and transferability, local permit and CUP compliance, cannabis-specific title encumbrances, environmental assessment for cultivation and extraction residuals, IRS 280E tax exposure, ADA compliance, and the alignment of the real estate timeline with the DCC’s change-of-ownership review process — considerations that standard commercial real estate attorneys are not equipped to address in an integrated way. The Law Office of Shay Aaron Gilmore guides cultivators, distributors, manufacturers, testing labs, retailers, investors, landowners, and management companies through cannabis property purchases, sales, and financings throughout California, coordinating land use, regulatory, corporate, environmental, employment, and IP review in a single engagement.
Named as one of the Top 20 Cannabis Lawyers in California by the Los Angeles/San Francisco Daily Journal, recognized among the Top 200 Global Cannabis Lawyers by Cannabis Law Journal, and listed among the Top 100 Lawyers in Northern California by Super Lawyers® Magazine, Shay Aaron Gilmore serves as a Board Member of the International Cannabis Bar Association (INCBA), Founder of the Cannabis Practitioners Group of the California Lawyers Association, and Co-Founder of the Cannabis Law Section of the Bar Association of San Francisco.

Top 20 California Cannabis Lawyers
The Daily Journal

Global Top 200 Cannabis Lawyer
Cannabis Law Journal
Confirm that all licenses associated with the property or business are: (a) current and not expired; (b) in “Active” status, not “Suspended,” “Revoked,” or “Pending Renewal”; (c) not subject to a pending Statement of Issues or Accusation (the DCC’s administrative complaint documents). License status can change between the time a purchase agreement is signed and the time of closing — ongoing monitoring through the DCC portal and the Office of Administrative Hearings docket is standard practice in longer-duration transactions.
The DCC’s enforcement database and the Office of Administrative Hearings‘ docket are public records. A thorough review covers: prior DCC citations and fines; resolved and pending Statements of Issues and Accusations; consent agreements; and administrative law judge decisions. A history of DCC enforcement action — even resolved action — affects license transferability, DCC approval timeline for ownership changes, and negotiated deal terms.
Cannabis cultivation and manufacturing operations create environmental conditions that warrant specific investigation:
Standard title review must be supplemented for cannabis properties to specifically examine:
For cannabis M&A and business acquisition due diligence, see Corporate Law. For DCC regulatory compliance review and licensing counsel, see Regulatory Compliance. For DCC license defense and administrative proceedings, see Administrative Law. For employment diligence in cannabis acquisitions, see Employment & Labor Law. For IP diligence and brand licensing schedules, see Intellectual Property Law.
For recent developments in California cannabis real estate, see: Cannabis Retail and Cultivation Expand in SoCal, While NorCal Faces Environmental Woes.
| Factor | Cannabis Real Estate | Hemp Real Estate |
|---|---|---|
| License verification | DCC portal + PRA request for enforcement history and conditions | CDFA registration and county ag commissioner registration; no public enforcement portal |
| Local permit verification | Local cannabis operator permit, CUP, and business tax registration | County ag commissioner registration; no local cannabis permit required |
| CEQA compliance | Required for annual license renewal — must be documented | May apply but not a licensing prerequisite in the same way |
| Environmental (pesticides) | Cannabis-specific pesticide contamination risk is high for prior cultivation sites | Agricultural pesticide use subject to CDPR permitting; standard Phase I applies |
| Title — deed restrictions | Must specifically check for anti-cannabis and anti-controlled-substance provisions | Check for anti-agricultural or land use restrictions; less common issue |
| Financing | Private lenders, cannabis funds, seller financing — institutional lending generally unavailable | Conventional institutional financing generally available for hemp properties |
| ADA compliance | Required for retail facilities as public accommodations | Not applicable to cultivation and processing sites |
| DCC change-of-ownership review | Required for ≥20% ownership transfers — can take months; must be sequenced with closing | Not applicable |
| IRS 280E exposure | Material — prior operator's 280E liability can create federal tax lien risk | Not applicable — hemp businesses are not subject to 280E |
For hemp cultivation land use issues including CDFA registration and Williamson Act compliance, see Hemp Cultivation & Land Use. For cannabis real estate lease due diligence, see Cannabis Commercial Lease Negotiation.
How cannabis operators secure local CUPs and navigate setback requirements before committing to a site.