⚖️ Federal Rescheduling: On April 22, 2026, the U.S. DOJ issued a final order immediately moving state-licensed medical marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act. A broader DEA administrative hearing to consider rescheduling of all marijuana begins June 29, 2026.

INTEGRATED LEGAL SERVICES FOR CALIFORNIA'S CANNABIS AND HEMP INDUSTRIES

Eight Practice Areas. One Lawyer Who Actually Knows the Industries.

California’s cannabis and hemp industries operate under a legal framework that does not resemble any other regulated industry in the country. State-licensed but federally prohibited. Locally controlled but state-administered. Capital-intensive but bank-restricted. Brand-driven but trademark-limited. The result is that legal questions in this industry rarely fit cleanly inside one practice area — a corporate question routinely turns into a regulatory question, a real estate matter often becomes an IP issue, and a financing transaction almost always implicates licensing disclosure obligations.

The Law Office of Shay Aaron Gilmore is structured to handle that integration under one roof. Shay has been recognized as one of the Top 20 California Cannabis Lawyers by the Los Angeles/San Francisco Daily Journal, a Northern California Super Lawyer, a Top 100 Lawyer in Northern California by Super Lawyers® Magazine, and one of the Top 200 Global Cannabis Lawyers by Cannabis Law Journal. He serves on the Board of Directors of the International Cannabis Bar Association (INCBA), as Chair of the California Lawyers Association Cannabis Practitioners Group, and as Co-Founder of the Bar Association of San Francisco Cannabis Law Section.

The eight services below describe how the firm works with cannabis and hemp operators, investors, founders, and license-holders across the State of California. They are not separate departments — they are a single, coordinated practice. Most engagements draw on more than one.

Recognized By

Eight Services. One Lawyer.

Corporate law services for cannabis and hemp businesses in California

Corporate Law

Entity formation, governance, M&A, and ownership structuring for license-holders.

Corporate law services for cannabis and hemp businesses in California

Commercial Contracts

Supply, distribution, licensing, and vendor agreements built to be enforceable.

Corporate law services for cannabis and hemp businesses in California

Real Estate & Land Use

Site selection, leases, zoning, CEQA, and conditional use permits.

Corporate law services for cannabis and hemp businesses in California

Regulatory Compliance

DCC, CDFA, CDPH, and local licensing — ongoing compliance counsel.

Corporate law services for cannabis and hemp businesses in California

Intellectual Property

Trademarks, trade secrets, patents, and brand protection inside federal limits.

Corporate law services for cannabis and hemp businesses in California

Venture Capital Counsel

Convertible notes, priced rounds, and investor representation in cannabis financings

Corporate law services for cannabis and hemp businesses in California

Employment & Labor Law

Compliance, internal investigations, handbooks, and labor relations for cannabis and hemp employers.

Corporate law services for cannabis and hemp businesses in California

Administrative Law

DCC enforcement defense, license proceedings, and agency rulemaking.

Why Operators and Investors Choose This Firm

Industry-first practice. This is not a general business firm with a cannabis client list. Every engagement at the Law Office of Shay Aaron Gilmore involves cannabis or hemp. That focus means the firm already knows the regulatory environment, the recurring deal structures, the standard contract risks, the agency personalities, and the local ordinances of every major California cannabis jurisdiction — before the first call.

Integrated counsel. Most cannabis legal problems span multiple practice areas. A licensing question becomes a corporate question becomes a real estate question. The firm handles all eight services described above directly, which means clients are not forced to coordinate between three outside firms or absorb the cost of duplicate intake, duplicate conflict checks, and duplicate ramp-up.

Operator-grade documentation. Contracts, governance documents, and compliance programs are drafted to function under stress — under regulatory scrutiny, under investor disputes, and under market shifts that California’s cannabis industry produces on a regular basis. The goal of every document the firm produces is durability.

What Our Clients Say

Testimonials or endorsements do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Results depend on the specific facts and legal circumstances of each case.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. The firm represents license-holders across the supply chain — cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, retail, delivery, and testing — and also represents investors, family offices, and funds deploying capital into the California cannabis and hemp markets. Where a conflict between two existing clients could arise on a specific transaction, the firm declines the second engagement.
The practice focuses on advisory, transactional, regulatory, and administrative work. When a matter requires courtroom litigation, the firm coordinates with appropriate specialist litigation counsel and, where the client requests it, supervises that representation alongside the underlying business strategy.
Engagements range from pre-license startups and single-location operators through multi-license vertically integrated operators and institutional investors. Service structures (project-based, transaction-based, or ongoing retainer arrangements) are scaled to match the company’s stage and legal volume.
The firm’s regulatory and licensing practice is California-specific. Corporate, contract, IP, and investor representation work is regularly performed for multi-state operators and investors whose deal flow involves California-licensed targets or California-based counterparties.
Most matters are billed on an hourly basis with a retainer. Ongoing advisory engagements can be structured as fixed monthly retainers calibrated to the client’s legal volume. Defined transactional matters (entity formations, financings, license transfers) can be quoted on a flat-fee basis when scope is clear.
Use the Schedule a Consultation button on this page, or send an email to shay@shaygilmorelaw.com with a short summary of the matter. Initial consultations are conducted by phone or video and are scoped to confirm fit, identify conflicts, and outline next steps.

These answers were prepared by Shay Aaron Gilmore, a California-licensed attorney recognized as one of the Top 20 Cannabis Lawyers in California by The Daily Journal. These answers are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship.

Cannabis and Hemp Law Insights

While Rescheduling Unifies Some Federal Tax Treatment, California Cannabis and Hemp Keep Diverging Along the THC Line

Marijuana rescheduling now unifies some federal tax treatment, but California cannabis and hemp keep diverging along the THC line. This post walks operators and investors through what the shift means for entity choice, Section 280E, ownership disclosure, exits, and staying compliant — and why the cannabis-hemp divide is widening even as one federal tax answer emerges.

The April 22 Rescheduling Order: What We Know, What We Don’t, and What to Watch Before June 29

The April 22, 2026 rescheduling order moves state-licensed medical marijuana to Schedule III — but leaves adult-use cannabis in Schedule I, creates contested treaty-compliance mechanisms, and opens a June 27 DEA registration deadline that demands immediate attention from California dual A/M operators. Here is what we know, what remains genuinely uncertain, and what to watch before June 29.

Recent and Expected California Cannabis & Hemp Rulemaking to Govern the Licensed Supply Chains for Years to Come

California cannabis and hemp operators face five active or anticipated rulemakings in 2026 — covering multipack cannabis goods, pesticide residue testing, cultivation requirements, METRC track-and-trace reform, and AB 8 implementation. California cannabis attorney Shay Aaron Gilmore breaks down each DCC rulemaking proceeding, the AB 8 two-year countdown to hemp-DCC licensing integration, and why administrative law counsel delivers its highest value before any enforcement action begins.

Ready to Talk Through Your Matter?

The fastest way to get a clear read on your situation is a scoped initial consultation. Most operators and investors leave the first call with a concrete next step and an honest assessment of legal exposure.