HEMP AGRICULTURAL LABOR& WORKFORCE COMPLIANCE
Recognized By

Top 20 California Cannabis Lawyers
The Daily Journal

Global Top 200 Cannabis Lawyer
Cannabis Law Journal
The Agricultural Labor Relations Framework for Hemp Cultivators
Whether hemp cultivation employees are covered by the NLRA (federal) or the ALRA (California) depends on the nature of the work performed — and the answer determines which agency has jurisdiction over organizing campaigns, unfair labor practice charges, and collective bargaining rights.
NLRA vs. ALRA — The Agricultural Exemption
The NLRA explicitly exempts “agricultural laborers” from its coverage (29 U.S.C. §152(3)), meaning employees who perform agricultural labor — as defined under the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. §3121(g)) — are not covered by federal labor law and may not file NLRB election petitions or NLRB unfair labor practice charges. California’s Agricultural Labor Relations Act (Labor Code §1140 et seq.) fills this gap for California agricultural workers, giving hemp cultivation employees the right to organize, bargain collectively, and engage in concerted activity under state law — with the ALRB administering elections and investigating unfair agricultural labor practices.
The critical distinction for hemp operators:
- Hemp cultivation workers (planting, maintaining, harvesting) are generally agricultural laborers covered by the ALRA, not the NLRA
- Hemp processing and manufacturing workers (extraction, infusion, packaging, distribution) are generally covered by the NLRA, not the ALRA
- Mixed operations (same workforce performs both cultivation and processing) present a classification question that requires analysis of the primary duty of the workforce and the nature of the operation
DPR Pesticide Safety Training Requirements
Hemp cultivation employers are required by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation to comply with Worker Safety Regulations (3 CCR §6700 et seq.), which require:
- Annual pesticide safety training for all agricultural workers and handlers before they perform work in treated fields or handle pesticide products (3 CCR §6724)
- Field posting and oral warnings before workers enter a field treated with a pesticide with a restricted-entry interval (3 CCR §6761–6770)
- Decontamination facilities — soap, water, and clean change areas — within one-quarter mile of all work sites and accessible to workers during work hours (3 CCR §6734)
- Emergency medical care — operators must ensure that appropriate emergency medical treatment is available and that workers can be transported to medical facilities in the event of pesticide exposure
- Pesticide safety information display — the DPR Pesticide Safety Information Series leaflets must be posted in a central location accessible to workers (3 CCR §6723)
County agricultural commissioners enforce DPR worker safety regulations for hemp cultivation sites — the same commissioners who enforce CDFA hemp registration compliance.
IWC Wage Order 14 — Agricultural Occupations
| Wage and Hour Element | Wage Order 14 (Hemp Cultivation) | General Industry Wage Orders (Cannabis Operations) |
|---|---|---|
| Overtime threshold | 10 hours/day; 60 hours/week (not 8/40) | 8 hours/day; 40 hours/week |
| Double time threshold | Over 10 hours after working 6 consecutive days | Over 12 hours/day; over 8 hours on 7th consecutive day |
| Piece-rate obligation (Labor Code §226.2) | Applies | Applies |
| Meal period (30 min.) | After 5 hours worked | After 5 hours worked |
| Rest period (10 min.) | Per 4 hours worked | Per 4 hours worked |
| Housing and transportation deductions | Permitted with written agreement | Not applicable |
| Minimum wage | California statewide minimum | California statewide minimum |
ALRA Organizing Rights and Hemp Employer Obligations
ALRA Election Procedures
ALRA Unfair Agricultural Labor Practices
Conduct that constitutes an unfair agricultural labor practice (UALP) under the ALRA (Labor Code §1153) includes:
- Interfering with, restraining, or coercing agricultural workers in the exercise of their ALRA organizing rights
- Dominating or interfering with the formation or administration of a labor organization
- Discriminating against employees in terms of employment to discourage ALRA membership
- Refusing to bargain in good faith with a certified agricultural labor organization
- Retaliating against employees for filing ALRB charges or giving testimony in ALRB proceedings
The ALRB has the authority to order reinstatement with back pay, cease-and-desist orders, and affirmative remedies for UALP violations.
Cannabis vs. Hemp: Agricultural Labor and Workforce Compliance
| Dimension | Cannabis Operator | Hemp Cultivator |
|---|---|---|
| Primary labor law | NLRA (non-agricultural); ALRA may apply to cultivation | ALRA (cultivation); NLRA (processing/manufacturing) |
| Labor relations board | NLRB | ALRB (cultivation); NLRB (processing) |
| Wage order | Varies (Wage Orders 1, 4, 7 depending on operation type) | Wage Order 14 (Agricultural) for cultivation workers |
| Overtime threshold | 8 hours/day; 40 hours/week | 10 hours/day; 60 hours/week (Wage Order 14) |
| Pesticide safety training | Not required (DCC regulates, not DPR) | Required annually — 3 CCR §6724 |
| DPR enforcement | Not applicable | County agricultural commissioner |
| LPA requirement | Yes — 10+ employees under DCC licensing | No — MAUCRSA does not apply |
| CDFA registration | Not applicable | CDFA Industrial Hemp Program registration required |
| H-2A visa workers | Uncommon | Applicable for seasonal agricultural workers |
| Social equity conditions | May apply — local equity programs | Not applicable |
Representative Matters
Representative employment and labor law matters in hemp agricultural labor include:
- Counseled a hemp processor in the North Coast region on the transition from agricultural to general-industry labor law coverage for its processing workforce, clarifying which Wage Order (14 vs. 1) applied to each employee group and restructuring time-and-attendance practices to eliminate mixed-classification wage and hour exposure.
- Assisted a hemp cultivator with DPR worker safety compliance following a county agricultural commissioner inspection that identified gaps in pesticide safety training documentation and decontamination facility availability under 3 CCR §6734.
Frequently Asked Questions
Helpful Resources & Related Pages
Explore related employment, compliance, and legal services

